Why did Edie Parker’s estate lawsuit end with finding the Lanham Act preempts rights of publicity?

A federal court presiding over a dispute between the Edie Parker brand and the Edie Parker estate decided that:

  • Federal trademark claims preempt state law claims over right of publicity;

  • Properly maintained trademark rights could not be easily abandoned in the face of common-law tort claims; and

  • State law could not be held above the full purposes and objectives of Congress.

Read about the Edie Parker right of publicity case against the Edie Parker brand owner.

Klemchuk LLP

This blog is published by Klemchuk LLP, a litigation, intellectual property, transactional, and international business law firm dedicated to protecting innovation. The firm provides tailored legal solutions to industries including software, technology, retail, real estate, consumer goods, ecommerce, telecommunications, restaurant, energy, media, and professional services.

The firm publishes Ideate, a blog discussing the latest news and insights into intellectual property law, business, and culture.

Previous
Previous

Why is DoorDash against a new NYC law regarding sharing of consumer information?

Next
Next

Why should trademark owners beware of trademark scams?