Why is the copyright infringement case between Unicolors and H&M significant for copyright law?

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a copyright infringement case that involves H&M allegedly infringing upon a Unicolors’s copyright registration. The issue at hand is significant for copyright law because:

  • It could affirm or reverse a Ninth Circuit holding that there no longer needs to be intent to defraud the Copyright Office for a registration to be invalid; and

  • It examines the process of combined filings and referral back to the Copyright Office when there has been no indicia of fraud or material error.

Read about how the Supreme Court will rule on copyright invalidation requirements.

Klemchuk LLP

This blog is published by Klemchuk LLP, a litigation, intellectual property, transactional, and international business law firm dedicated to protecting innovation. The firm provides tailored legal solutions to industries including software, technology, retail, real estate, consumer goods, ecommerce, telecommunications, restaurant, energy, media, and professional services.

The firm publishes Ideate, a blog discussing the latest news and insights into intellectual property law, business, and culture.

Previous
Previous

Why is the latest ALI copyright restatement considered a pivotal change in law?

Next
Next

Why is Bolsinger’s trade secret misappropriation lawsuit against the Astros raising interesting IP questions?