What did the Supreme Court define as limitations to the doctrine of Assignor Estoppel?

The Supreme Court in the Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. case reaffirmed that assignor estoppel is a doctrine that is alive in patent law, but also helped define and cement the boundaries of the doctrine with limits in:

  • blanket assignments;

  • unfavorable changes in law; and

  • post assignment developments.

Read about how the Supreme Court defined three limitations to assignor estoppel in patent cases.

Klemchuk LLP

This blog is published by Klemchuk LLP, a litigation, intellectual property, transactional, and international business law firm dedicated to protecting innovation. The firm provides tailored legal solutions to industries including software, technology, retail, real estate, consumer goods, ecommerce, telecommunications, restaurant, energy, media, and professional services.

The firm publishes Ideate, a blog discussing the latest news and insights into intellectual property law, business, and culture.

Previous
Previous

Can Artificial Intelligence be listed as a patent inventor?

Next
Next

How could Nike’s stance against customization art by Drip Creationz create a negative effect?